Question on salvation
Hello Bro John-Paul,
Recently, I was reading a book by a Benedictine monk which expounds the immense love of God through the Incarnation and Resurrection, and how the Resurrection has won for us eternal life with the Father. Hence salvation is obtained not by us being good and earning it, but by the perfect sacrifice on the cross. We are unable to work for our salvation.
Lately I had a discussion about the issue of salvation with some friends. Some are atheists and one is Protestant, and the discussion revealed the differences in our views about it. There is especially a large disparity in the Catholic and Protestant understanding of salvation.
For the Protestant, salvation is by faith.
However I understand that our Catholic teaching teaches that people of other faiths, who through their actions, display the fruits of God's love, i.e. charity and compassion etc, will too enter heaven. Even atheists possess the voice of God (conscience) to direct them in the right path. Because of this 'liberal' view, Protestants have often accused Catholics of working for their salvation; that is Catholics believe in salvation by works.
The Catholic teaching then seems an outright contradiction of Romans 10: 9-10, since clearly, we do not expect these good Buddhists, Muslims, Hindus, and even Jews to "confess that Jesus is Lord" verbally, or even intellectually, or else they wouldn't be what they are! To say that heaven is due to them by virtue of their good lives is to say that they have merited heaven by being good, i.e. by their works. Since salvation cannot be worked for as what the monk taught (which I presume is the orthodox teaching of the Catholic Church), then by what are these Buddhists, Muslims, Hindus, Jews and many others saved? Can we say that their confession of "Jesus is Lord" is through the way they lived their lives, that they have been begotten by God even when they do not know about it?
If we are not able to work for our own salvation, what does it mean when one of the aims of the Dominican order is "for the salvation of souls"?
If our salvation is not dependent on our works, then what is the point of the Final Judgement?
Thank you for answering these three questions, they are all getting too confusing, especially when trying to get it across to a Protestant!
Kelvin
QUESTION from Kelvin on February 3, 2003
"If you confess that Jesus is Lord and believe that God raised him from death, you will be saved. For it is by our faith that we are put right with God; it is by our confession that we are saved." (Romans 10: 9-10)
ANSWER by John-Paul Ignatius, OLSM on February 10, 2003
|
Dear Kevin: The question about Salvation is indeed a point of controversy between Protestants and Catholics. But the Catholic position is not really different from the Protestant in basic essence. The problem is that Protestants have an incomplete notion of justification and salvation that stems from the misinterpretations of primarily Luther and especially Calvin. The Protestant notion in its full context is, in fact, a material heresy -- a man-made doctrine. The Catholic Church's teaching, on the other hand, is throughly Biblical. The Catholic Church has always taught that we are saved by grace "through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: Not of works, lest any man should boast." -- Eph 2:8-9 Martin Luther has a motivation to deny the authority of the Church and the dependence upon her Sacraments and thus he contrived a purely man-made doctrine that would circumvent God's appointed and established Church. It is the heretics of Luther and Calvin that developed the idea of "faith alone" and "once-saved-always-saved". Romans 3:28 states: "For we hold that a man is justified by faith apart from works of law." Martin Luther in his German translation inserted the word "alone" after the word "faith" to read: "For we hold that a man is justified by faith ALONE apart from works of law." It is rather amazing when anti-Catholics accuse the Catholic Church of "adding" to the Bible. This could not be further from the truth. The Catholic Church preserved the WHOLE of Scripture. It was Luther, et al who raped the Bible tearing it apart taking seven books out of the Old Testament (seven books that Jesus considered to be the Bible, I might add) and then Luther adding words to the Scripture that are not there. Luther also wanted to remove the book of James, which he called "an epistle of straw", the book of Revelations and Hebrews I believe. He did not succeed in tearing apart the New Testament, but he did add words to Romans 3:28 and remove seven books from the Old Testament. Given that anti-Catholics invoke the penalty of Rev 22:18-19 because they think we added to the Bible, historical facts show that the only ones to add or subtract from the Bible are the Protestants. Thus if the penalty of Rev 22:18-19 belongs to anyone it belongs to the Protestants for their arrogance and rebellion to ripe the Bible apart.
Rev 22:18-19 states: "For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book: The seriousness of "adding" to Scripture puzzled some of the contemporaries of Luther. Luther was confronted on why he had added the word "alone" to Romans 3:28. His response is VERY revealing and in one way or another, to one degree or another, represents the nature of all of Protestantism. To the criticism of adding the word "alone" to Romans 3:28 Martin Luther replied:
"You tell me what a great fuss the Papists are making because the word 'alone' is not in the text of Paul. If your Papist makes such an unnecessary row about the word 'alone,' say right out to him: 'Dr. Martin Luther will have it so,' and say: 'Papist and asses are one and the same thing.' I will have it so, and I order it to be so, and my will is reason enough. I know very well that the word 'alone' is not in the Latin or the Greek text, and it was not necessary for the Papists to teach me that. It is true those letters are not in it, which letters the jackasses look at, as a cow stares at a new gate...It shall remain in my New Testament, and if all the Popish donkeys were to get mad and beside themselves, they will not get it out." Thus sayeth the "humble" Martin Luther. In fact the ONLY place in the REAL Bible where the words "faith alone" appear is in James 2:24 (RSV) where is says: "You see that a man is justified by works and not by faith alone." The King James Version says "not by faith only" which is the same point. The Catholics have a mature and humble understanding of Salvation that squares EXACTLY with Scripture. Salvation is a free gift of God, a free grace, that cannot be earned by the works of the law (Rom 3:28), but is a gift of grace through faith. St. James clarifies that is meant by "faith". He says that Faith without works is DEAD. He says that man is justified by works and not by faith alone." But the "works" that James is referring to is NOT the works of the Law that St. Paul mentions. St. James is referring to the works of LOVE. IF we have faith we WILL show that faith in works of love. If we do not have works of love, then our faith is dead. Dead faith is non-existant faith, and if we have no faith then we have no salvation. No amount of good works will bring someone to heaven. Salvation is by the grace of God given free to whom He chooses upon the faith of the person. Catholics have ALWAYS taught that. In fact, the Protestants "borrowed" that teaching from the Catholics. As for the salvation of non-Catholics we must affirm that Salvation is ONLY through the Catholic Church because Jesus says so. He is the way the truth and the Light and NO ONE comes to the Father except through Him. And Jesus established His Bride, His Church (Matt 16, Isa 22:21-23) to be the vehicle that bring people to Him so He can then present them to His Father. But, does that mean that anyone who is not Catholic (Protestants, Orthodox, Anglicans, Jews, Hundu, Buddhists, etc) cannot find salvation? No. No Father is going deny entrance into His House to someone who sincerely desires to find Him merely because that person has not heard of Christ or has not been given the enlightenment to know that God desires us to be in the Catholic Church. The Church officially teaches, as listed in the Catechism:
The Church and non-Christians As for the mandate to save souls, to do missions and evangelism, the Church states:
848 "Although in ways known to himself God can lead those who, through no fault of their own, are ignorant of the Gospel, to that faith without which it is impossible to please him, the Church still has the obligation and also the sacred right to evangelize all men." While it is possible for a non-Catholics or non-Christians to find salvation through God's grace, when they, through no fault of their own do not know Christ or His Church, it is not the normitive way, or the surest way. That is why we must evangelize. God wants all His children to experience the FULLNESS of the Faith He has given us and the FULLNESS of His revelation to us and His self-sacrifice for us. That FULLNESS is only found in the Catholic Church. I hope this helps a little.
God Bless, |